What: All Issues : Health Care : Access to Health Insurance : (H.R. 4872) On a motion allowing a vote on passage of an amendment to immediately suspend health care reform legislation if the Congressional Budget Office estimated that it would not reduce the deficit as predicted in any given year, by waiving the Senate’s budget rules
 Who: All Members
[POW!]
 

To find out how your Members of Congress voted on this bill, use the form on the right.

(H.R. 4872) On a motion allowing a vote on passage of an amendment to immediately suspend health care reform legislation if the Congressional Budget Office estimated that it would not reduce the deficit as predicted in any given year, by waiving the Senate’s budget rules
senate Roll Call 99     Mar 25, 2010
Y = Conservative
N = Progressive
Winning Side:
Progressive

This was ostensibly a vote on a motion to waive the Senate's budget rules with respect to an amendment by Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) that would have immediately suspended the implementation of health care reform legislation if the Congressional Budget Office [CBO] estimated that it would not reduce the deficit as predicted in any given year. (The CBO had projected the legislation would reduce the deficit every year in which it was in effect.) The measure Vitter sought to amend was a “companion bill” making a number of changes to health care reform legislation already signed into law by President Obama. The underlying context was that Republicans were trying to attach amendments to the companion bill in order to send it back the House, where it had passed by a narrow margin. CNN reported that Republicans had chosen to offer a slew of amendments in order to “undermine the measure,” while the Associated Press characterized the amendments as “a final drive to thwart President Barack Obama's health care remake.”

Vitter urged support for his amendment: “My amendment …says for any fiscal year when those CBO [the Congressional Budget Office] costs or deficit reduction projections are busted, the entire ObamaCare bill is suspended. So, in fact, if this is ballooning spending and ballooning the deficit, we will stop it in its tracks.”

Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) urged opposition to the amendment, saying it would “suspend health care reform if certain arbitrary budget targets are not met….It is clearly designed to kill the bill.” Baucus made a point of order that amendment violated the Senate’s budget rules, which prohibit amendments to bills considered under the reconciliation process if those amendments have no direct impact on the budget. Vitter made a motion to waive the budget rules. Motions to waive those rules require 60 votes for passage.

After the House and Senate both passed their respective health care reform bills, the two chambers had intended to reconcile those two bills into a final package. After the House and Senate passed that final package, it would have been sent to President Obama, who would have signed it into law. Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA), however, won a special election to replace the late Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) before the final health care bill could be brought up for a vote. Brown's victory gave Republicans 41 votes in the Senate, leaving Democrats with 59 members – one vote short of the 60 votes they needed to defeat a unanimous Republican filibuster against the final health care bill. 

In order to pass comprehensive health care legislation without a 60-vote majority in the Senate, Democratic leaders devised a plan in which the House would pass the Senate health care bill (H.R. 3590), thereby enabling the president to sign it into law. The House would then pass a separate companion bill (H.R. 4872) to make changes to the Senate health measure under a process known as "budget reconciliation." Bills considered under budget reconciliation cannot be filibustered under Senate rules. This process allowed the House to make changes to Senate-passed health care legislation without sending the entire health bill back to the Senate, where it could have been filibustered indefinitely.   The companion bill incorporated changes to the Senate health care legislation desired by House Democrats. The House passed the companion measure, and sent it to the Senate, where Democratic leaders hoped to defeat all amendments -- thereby avoiding a second vote in the House on a substantively changed bill; a vote that Democrats might have lost given the already tight margin when it was voted on the previous week.

The Senate rejected the motion to waive its budget rules by a vote of 39-56. All 39 Republicans voted “yea.” All 56 Democrats present voted “nay.” As a result, the Senate effectively rejected an amendment Democratic leaders feared could have torpedoed the entire companion health care bill and would have immediately suspended the implementation of health care reform legislation if the CBO estimated that it would not reduce the deficit as predicted in any given year.

Issue Areas:

Find your Member of
Congress' votes

Select by Name